Last week on our sister site, Design Observer, Steven Heller went head to head with none other than….Ralph Nader? Yes, the former presidential candidate and long-time consumer rights activist dipped his toe into some casual armchair design criticism via his blog, a space usually used for political opinions and current events commentary (sample post: OPEN LETTER TO BOEING – Passengers First, Ground the 737 MAX 8 Now!). Nader’s argument can be more or less summed up with the belief that the current trend in print newspaper design is to give precious space to the whims of “graphic artists” and less space to actual text, resulting in small type that he deems illegible.
Heller’s argument is more or less that Nader doesn’t know what he’s talking about—his argument is both uninformed and untrue—and Heller offers some compelling comebacks that evidence the careful consideration that goes into (and has always gone into) newspaper design hierarchy; considering space, legibility, and images/graphic elements that draw the eye. You can read the full thing, but I’ll leave you with a choice passage from our former New York Times art director:
“Function should not follow art,” which is true, but show me where these problems occur in any major newspaper section and I’ll vote for Mr. Nader the next time he runs for office. “Readers should not have to squint to make out the text on the page. Some readers might even abandon an article because of its illegible text! One wonders why editors have ceded control of the readability of their publications to graphic designers,” he adds, referring to no particular designers, art directors, or editors that I’ve ever met. Editors are very turf conscious. While Mr. Nader correctly states that “Editors cannot escape responsibility by saying that the graphic designers know best,” I don’t recall anyone like that among the many editors I’ve known.